Today I’m shipping several updates to Alignvote. These new features help voters share their rankings with others.

This release also provides summarized Alignvote log data to participating candidates. Alignvote does not collect or store any personally identifiable information — this is just aggregated data on the user sessions as input by voters, including what issues and stances are most often input to the system, how strongly people feel about different issues, and how well the candidate is scoring.

New feature summary:

  • Improved Candidate Dashboard
  • Candidates can now list Endorsements, Funds raised or momentum, and provide a Personal Statement. These new text fields show up, if provided, in the candidate profile box.
  • Candidates can see analytics about what issues and stances are most popular from the logs
  • For voters, each ranking session is now shareable via a unique Permalink, allowing it to be bookmarked, blogged-about, saved for later, linked-to, or otherwise shared on social media

Note: The phrase “Participating Candidates” simply means those candidates who have completed the Alignvote Questionnaire.

There are no fees associated with Alignvote, nor are any elaborations required. We simply want candidates to complete the survey, which unlocks these extra features. That’s because we feel it’s good for voters to know where candidates stand; you can always provide elaborations on those stances.

(Special shout-out to CM Kshama Sawant of D3, who provided clear elaborations on every single issue.)

Improved Candidate Dashboard

Enhanced Candidate Profiles

Candidates, you can now add Endorsements, Funds Raised and a Personal Statement to your profile. Each of these are optional. Candidates, it is up to your campaign to keep these as up-to-date as you’d like; these fields will be indicated as “candidate-provided” information.

They’re available only to participating candidates; you have to have completed the Questionnaire for voters. These will be shown on every ranking view, and may further help voters determine which candidates are strongest and/or more “viable” for their vote.

Analytics from Logs

Participating Candidates can now see summaries of how they’re ranking, as well as what’s important to voters, in aggregate, via their dashboard.

Alignvote displays the number of times a profile is viewed
Candidates can now see how often they’ve ranked #1, #2, etc.

We make it VERY clear that these are simply logs of user sessions and are not a scientific poll.

With that said, information on voter sentiment might be directionally useful to a campaign, so we provide it transparently to all Participating Candidates:

How are voters answering the questions? How important are they saying those stances are?

Permalink Makes Each Unique Voter Ranking Session Shareable

Voters now get a Permalink with every ranking result set. You can share this Permalink on social media (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, Nextdoor, Email, etc.), or simply save it for voting day. The Permalink is provided right at the top of the results page:

Alignvote in the News

I joined Ross Reynolds of KUOW 94.9FM to discuss Alignvote earlier this week. Listen to the full 15 minute segment here, about halfway down the page:

A few weeks back I added a Fairness and Equitable Treatment of Candidates section to the About page. Here it is in full:

Fairness and Equitable Treatment of Candidates

We commit to offering candidates an equitable platform. That includes, but is not limited to:

  • The similarity-score calculation is the same for all candidates.
  • The only weighting which is applied in the similarity score is the one the voter sets around the importance level of the issue to them.
  • There is no candidate weighting or skew applied to the similarity score or ranking.
  • All candidates have full and equal access to their own questionnaire dashboard, where they can confirm their stances, and elaborate as they wish.
  • All registered and eligible candidates have been invited to the dashboard (on the same day), some repeatedly nudged to access it.
  • Best efforts are made to notify all candidates of new features or changes at or near the same time, certainly the same day.
  • No filtering-out or in is performed of what any candidate says.
  • There is no fee charged to any candidate to participate.
  • No personal preference of anyone involved on the Alignvote team will influence the similarity ranking calculation.
  • Candidate elaborations on issues are shuffled, so that over time no one candidate’s answer gets first or last billing.
  • Alignvote makes no changes to stances once the candidate submits their stances.
  • No editing is done to what any candidate writes. Voters see what they write immediately when they update it.
  • All candidates have been asked to optionally submit a good and fair question for consideration in a future round.
  • All candidates can and should confirm that they rank #1 for any voter test where they pretend to be a voter who has precisely the same stances, on any browser, anywhere, any time.

As always, we invite candidates and campaigns to test any and all of the above, and provide any reproducible results or videos if they spot favoritism or skew in the results. Any concern about the questions themselves should be focused on what the next round of questions should include, or questions that are on the minds of voters, with a complete and reasonable set of options. All candidates have been invited to officially submit one consideration in the next round.

Election Day is August 6th!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.